A Wrenching Transformation is Required
For this new treaty to be finalised, every country must sign up. This is a challenging requirement; developing countries need significant financial assistance. It is possibly less difficult for developed countries which have substantial populations that are prepared to face Al Gore’s proposed “wrenching transformation” required including: manufacturing job losses, lower wages, reliance on public and traditional non-carbon transport options, specific carbon taxes on meat, petrol, dairy, thermally generated electricity, increases in costs associated with an emissions trading scheme, an elimination of canine populations, a reduction in problem human populations and SUV’s and at the same time providing substantial increases in aid to developing countries such as China, Africa, South Korea and India.
The preamble is not without its limitations. While noting a requirement to increase agricultural production and at the same time reducing agricultural emissions, it fails to acknowledge that the only way to do this is to minimise meat production and dairying and encourage an organic vegetarian culture.
The only way that communities, particularly groups worth saving, identified in the Treaty as “women, children, indigenous groups, rural groups and the elderly,” can be protected and fed while growing food in a carbon-neutral way, is for the rest of the population, particularly the carbon gluttons of developed countries like America and New Zealand, to be significantly reduced, for meat production and consumption to end and dogs eliminated.
Eating meat will be a thing of the past,Wont that be great,Yummy veggies I can't wait
have you seen the price of veggies in the shops lately.
And all dogs will be eliminated.
I can just see it now meat addicts will turn to cannibalism and with no dogs to warn us we are lunch
Removing the Problem Areas
The UN has determined that by 2050, without appropriate intervention, the population could increase by 50% to over 9 billion. This increase in developed country population is clearly unsustainable given the greater developed country carbon-footprint and would reduce the ability of the world to meet its carbon responsibilities.
an elimination of canine populations, a reduction in problem human populations
Shit looks like what i was saying about New World Order population reduction by any means was true,Only 1 question is how do they get rid of billions of people ? to leave just 500,000,000 living on the planet,
And 2 Who decides who lives and who dies ? Maybe who is the UN World Health Organisation
