Xtra News Community 2
October 18, 2017, 09:16:45 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Xtra News Community 2 — please also join our XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP.
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links BITEBACK! XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP Staff List Login Register  

Some reading for the “anti-warmalists” and “climate-change deniers”


Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Some reading for the “anti-warmalists” and “climate-change deniers”  (Read 11338 times)
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #925 on: October 12, 2017, 09:25:21 pm »

Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #926 on: October 13, 2017, 04:57:50 am »

Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #927 on: October 13, 2017, 10:38:33 am »

Any pennies dropping yet?  Grin
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #928 on: October 13, 2017, 10:52:27 am »


And so the “fake science” gets trotted out.

Funny, that....
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #929 on: October 13, 2017, 01:00:44 pm »


from the Los Angeles Times....

How NASA tracks carbon emissions from space to better
understand — and deal with — climate change


By AMINA KHAN | 12:40PM PDT - Thursday, October 12, 2017

FIRES, drought and warmer temperatures were to blame for excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during the 2015-2016 El Niño, scientists with NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 say.

The findings, part of five papers published in the journal Science, shed light on the mechanisms through which Earth “breathes” carbon dioxide, a potent greenhouse gas, and reveal how those mechanisms affect climate change.

Global temperatures have been on the rise, thanks largely to the human-driven increase in greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. But not all of the carbon dioxide produced each year ends up in the atmosphere. Some of it ends up trapped in the ocean, or locked on land thanks to plants that use the gas during photosynthesis.

“We know how much we're emitting when we burn fossil fuel, and we see that about half of it stays in the atmosphere and the other half appears to go get absorbed into the land and the ocean,” said Jet Propulsion Laboratory atmospheric scientist Annmarie Eldering, the mission's deputy project scientist. “But there are still these questions of which parts of the land are doing that.”


This graphic depicts the unusually high levels of carbon dioxide release from three tropical continents during the 2015 El Niño. — Graphic: NASA-JPL/Caltech.
This graphic depicts the unusually high levels of carbon dioxide release from three tropical continents during the 2015 El Niño.
 — Graphic: NASA-JPL/Caltech.


And on top of that, the amount that gets pulled out of the atmosphere shifts dramatically from year to year, from about as little as 20% to as much as 80%.

“Why is it that there's a lot of variability from year to year?” Eldering said. “We didn't understand why that was.”

Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, or OCO-2, was launched in July 2014 to help discover those mechanisms and solve that mystery. Because the spacecraft was launched prior to the 2015-2016 El Niño season, it allowed the scientists to get a glimpse of the effect that the weather pattern had on the Earth's ability to store carbon.

“You can think of it as like a big natural experiment where you had a lot of heat and a lot of drought,” Eldering said. “So we could start investigating, how do plants respond when these conditions happen?”

OCO-2's near-infrared sensors revealed that normal carbon sinks — forests in tropical South America, tropical Africa and Indonesia — weren't pulling as much carbon down as they had in the past. But they were all doing so for different reasons.


An illustration of NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite at work in Earth's orbit. — Picture: NASA-JPL/Caltech.
An illustration of NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite at work in Earth's orbit. — Picture: NASA-JPL/Caltech.

In South America, a long drought was slowing down the growth of trees and other plants, which meant they were taking up carbon dioxide more slowly. In Africa, temperatures were higher, which could mean that dead plant matter was decomposing faster than usual, allowing carbon dioxide to escape. And in Indonesia, a rash of wildfires burned through trees, releasing their stored carbon, while also leaving fewer plants to pull that carbon down.

“Now we can see that the tropical forest and plants didn't absorb as much carbon as they usually do and that's what caused this big increase in that time period,” Eldering said.

Drought and higher temperatures have been linked to the climate change fueled by greenhouse gases. Now, it seems that there could be a vicious cycle at work.

“The projections of climate suggest there will be more heat and there will be more drought in the future,” Eldering said. “This would suggest that with more warmth and more heat, we'll have more carbon left in the atmosphere, so that would even accelerate the growth rate of carbon dioxide.”

The results should help experts develop more effective strategies to deal with climate change in the future, Eldering said.

“If you want to make a good plan, you've got to have some good information,” she said. “This is going to add to that information, and hopefully be reflected in a better plan down the road.”

The findings come a few months after President Trump’s budget plan proposed to cut OCO-3, a follow-up mission that would continue OCO-2's work.


• Amina Khan is a science writer covering a broad range of topics, from Mars rovers to linguistics to bio-inspired engineering — but she's perhaps best known for her repeated and brutal attacks on the office snack table. She surfs and snowboards in her spare time.

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-nasa-carbon-observatory-20171012-story.html
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #930 on: October 13, 2017, 01:02:21 pm »


Donald Trump and his partners in crime (stupid Republican righties) don't like organisations like NASA who do the scientific research, then publish the results, because it gives the lie to the desperate bullshit spouted by Trump, Republicans & co., so that is why they are planning to pull funding from organisations who carry out scientific research into the TRUTH, because the TRUTH disturbs their greedy, selfish, fucked-up minds.
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #931 on: October 13, 2017, 05:50:44 pm »

You think the graph I just posted is "fake"? Do tell.
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #932 on: October 13, 2017, 06:58:21 pm »

"The truth" hey? That sounds like some religious nut going off😁

CAGW(catastrophic anthropogenic global warming) is a theory. It's only a few decades old so a relatively new field. All the disaster scenarios that "might happen" are based on the theory that the tiny amount of Co2 in the atmosphere (and therefore tiny influence on warming) might somehow trigger runaway heating of the planet. Mostly this has been promoted by green/left zealots who got involved with this field. The main driver is politics (of the green/left variety). They use models (garbage in, in the form of a mere theory, and garbage out, in the form of dozens of failed predictions and pretending they have a crystal ball to feed an eager green/left media with a steady stream of "might happen" sensational crap (which grabs eyeballs and sells advertising... Hence why the media loves this shit).

Meanwhile you have dozens of eminent scientists appointed by the IPCC as lead authors and experts speaking out and stating "hang on this is all absolute crap!" That alone should stop any thinking person in their tracks.
There is more. Lots more.
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #933 on: October 13, 2017, 07:15:43 pm »

NASA and many universities are now in the hands of the green/left PC thought police. Anyone who thinks differently is screamed at, silenced, vilified (eg called a denier). It's all about Orwellian control. CAGW is so beloved of the green left because it provides a huge gravy train of government funding and is the ultimate idiological weapon for increasing neo-marxist and loony green policies.
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #934 on: October 13, 2017, 07:18:31 pm »

Meanwhile in the world of real science, no fucked up by green /left fascists, the science is in, fossil fuels have provided enormous net benefit to humankind, freeing people from hand to mouth drudgery, disease and early death.
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #935 on: October 14, 2017, 12:20:00 pm »


Fossil fuels are finite.

The sun's rays and the wind will last for a few more million years before the sun burns up and takes the earth with it.

DUMBARSE!!
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #936 on: October 14, 2017, 03:37:56 pm »

Yes *sounds* nice doesn't it. However, the current "renewables" designs are intermittent and piss weak therefore require expensive backup generators (gas, hydro) and/or expensive energy storage (insanely expensive batteries) .If you want the cost of EVERYTHING to massively increase, then use these dumb inefficient power generation methods!

 Fossil fuels still have probably a hundred or so years to run. Coal can be gasified and burned very cleanly and efficiently. It's just dumb to throw away cheap energy. It's not going to happen anyway. Human wellbeing will demand it's continuation. Fantasy schemes will be short lived and the parties supporting them will be quickly booted after huge power prices and blackouts severely fuck people off.
Report Spam   Logged
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 7022



WWW
« Reply #937 on: October 15, 2017, 04:30:32 pm »

i have read according to NASA sea levels have been getting lower lol i wonder how that fits into the global warming fairy story  Grin
Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #938 on: October 15, 2017, 05:22:56 pm »

There has been a non spectacular trend of sea level rise since the end of the last ice age about 12,000 years ago. That unspectacular trend continues as it has for the last 12000 years. Talk of "acceleration" due to humans is pure bullshit.
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #939 on: October 15, 2017, 11:49:51 pm »


Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah....we know where you're at.

Mr Selfish Twat who doesn't give a stuff about fucking up the planet for the next generations.

Yep....your kind stand out like a sore tooth.

Stick your head back in the sand and pretend your offspring and their offspring and their offspring don't matter, because you are a selfish twat.

Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #940 on: October 16, 2017, 12:21:04 am »

Nah you've got it all wrong. There probably are a few jerk who "don't care about the planet". The vast majority of people want clean air, oceans, waterways and soil,etc etc.
Not agreeing with the catastrophic climate change religion just means you see the climate change religion as a green left political agenda that's got out of control. That doesn't mean you want pollution. Get it? 😁
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #941 on: October 16, 2017, 12:24:09 am »

The trouble with the loony left is they think name calling is an argument.
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #942 on: October 16, 2017, 10:28:37 am »

So if 50+ leading climate scientists who where actually appointed by the IPCC as experts call bullshit on the theory of catastrophic man-made warmung, that doesn't make you think "maybe there's a problem here" KTJ? Hello???
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #943 on: October 16, 2017, 10:32:17 am »

If numerous energy economists tell you that the "solution" will actually kill vastly more people than the alleged problem, that doesn't make you think "um, maybe I should check that out"Huh
Report Spam   Logged
aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #944 on: October 16, 2017, 10:39:52 am »

The "you hate your grandchildren" rhetorical trick, is just like talking to fundy Christians when they tell you "yer goin' to hell for angering God" when you are trying to explain "but wait, first you need to prove your God exists" 😁
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Open XNC2 Smileys
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Buy traffic for your forum/website
traffic-masters
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.14 seconds with 12 queries.