Thats not nice. Its not about it being hard to understand. Its about conflicting information. Information that stands up on its own right. And both sides have plenty of quality data to support their theories.
No they don't!
One side is supported by science - the other is supported by personal greed... and it's not hard to tell the two apart.
I wasn't aiming to be 'nice' - I was aiming to explain it in simplified terms... and the whole thing is incredibly simple already.
I fail to see how anyone could be confused - it's very black and white.
Wonder why Rob still wont answer the "
If not Humans then what" question?
It's because there is nothing else it could be. Plain and simple.
Yet they still rant and rave...
A bit like a priest - he's fine until you ask him a few ticker questions about god and then it all crumbles.....