Xtra News Community 2
April 19, 2024, 11:09:23 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Xtra News Community 2 — please also join our XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP.
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links BITEBACK! XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP Staff List Login Register  

Air Force Skyhawks damaged by the elements

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Air Force Skyhawks damaged by the elements  (Read 106 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Newtown-Fella
Guest
« on: February 04, 2009, 08:51:02 am »

so its true then they are damaged ......

oh the furore that erupted on the old board about them all teh diehard labour supporters jumping up and down saying that National were wrong ...

well read on ...


The air force's 17 mothballed Skyhawk jet fighters are being damaged by being kept outside, the Government has confirmed.

The Skyhawks were decommissioned by the Labour Government in 2001 and are waiting to be sold.

They have been stored with a protective covering in the open at the Woodbourne air base, near Blenheim.

However, associate Defence Minister Heather Roy said the aircraft had been damaged by the weather.

"There is a little deterioration but no more than you would expect under the circumstances," she said.

Since the Skyhawks were moved out of a hangar and into the open in December 2007, the previous Government said the protective latex coating had worked and there had been no damage from the elements.

The Skyhawks were sold for $155 million to an American company but the sale had been held up by the US State Department, which must approve any sale of aircraft with American military avionics.

The Skyhawks may be old but they had been fitted with modern avionics, similar to the avionics in American F16 fighters.

The Skyhawks were to have been replaced by F16 fighters and a deal had been agreed to by the National Government before it was ousted at the polls by Labour in 1999. The new Labour Government axed the deal.

Last October the air force said rainwater had got into four of the 17 Skyhawks.

Parachute packs got damp and some instruments were a bit wet so components were removed and serviced.

The air force said there was no damage or impact on the sale or resale value of the aircraft.

In August, then defence minister Phil Goff confirmed some of the latex protective coverings had been torn in a storm but there was no damage.

Defence Minister Wayne Mapp said the sale of the aircraft was "progressing".

"That issue is largely going through the State Department and the Defence Department in the United States. It's an ongoing process," he said last week.

The delay of nearly seven years in the sale of the aircraft was the work of the previous government, he said.

"Frankly when they said they had been sold they did not really say there was a whole lot of conditionalities around that. You have also had issues with the change of administration," Dr Mapp said.

The air force's 17 Aermacchi training jets had also been on the market since 2001 but they were regularly flown to keep them airworthy.

http://www.3news.co.nz/Air-Force-Skyhawks-damaged-by-the-elements/tabid/423/articleID/89678/cat/64/Default.aspx
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Kiwithrottlejockey
Guest
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2009, 11:19:11 am »

so its true then they are damaged ......

oh the furore that erupted on the old board about them all teh diehard labour supporters jumping up and down saying that National were wrong ...



So you now admit that the Associate Minister of Defence (ACT's Heather Roy) was full-of-shit (as I posted) when she sang to Phil Goff's songbook (and Defence Minister Wayne Mapp nodded sagely while keeping his head down and allowing the Associate Minister of Defence to take all the flak)?

All this latest stuff shows is that following the National and ACT flip-flop a couple of weeks ago, they have flip-flopped yet again. The Nats in particular have been extremely proficient at flip-flopping since Don Brash began the practise a few years ago.

Do you want to know what I think? I think that this issue merely proves the old adage that politicians DON'T run things.....it's the Sir Humphrey's who really run things and that is why Heather Roy (and by his silence, Wayne Mapp) were singing from Phil Goff's songbook over this issue, because Phil Goff's songbook was actually written by a Sir Humphrey character in the Ministry of Defence from where Defence Ministers (and Associate Defence Ministers) get their advice.

It's a bit like the country's moneyman. He's a senior policy advisor from Treasury who literally holds the country's chequebook and who gets to whisper in the ear of whoever is the Minister of Finance, as well as also sitting in the Cabinet Room whenever Cabinet meets and he has a say on anything that involves spending money. He has been attached to the office of the Minister of Finance since the days when Muldoon was Dictator & Minister of Finance, and he has been the chief financial advisor (and the country's moneyman) since the days of David Caygill being the Minister of Finance (after Roger Douglas was tipped out of the position). He's still there, but these days he whispers in Bill English's ear. He is without a doubt one of the most powerful civil servants in the country, yet he is way below the radar screens of the news media, even though his name does occasionally appear on media releases from the Minister of Finance. The ultimate faceless beauracrat. I actually know the guy personally and you'd never guess who he was if you ran into him on the street.
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Open XNC2 Smileys
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.