Xtra News Community 2
October 18, 2017, 09:24:16 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Xtra News Community 2 — please also join our XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP.
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links BITEBACK! XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP Staff List Login Register  

What has changed is Donald “Dotard” Trump happened…


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What has changed is Donald “Dotard” Trump happened…  (Read 7 times)
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 27806


Having fun in the hills!


« on: September 27, 2017, 10:25:09 pm »


from The Washington Post....

North Korea's rhetoric is the same.
It's Trump's reaction that makes this different.


The incendiary language from Pyongyang is just the usual anti-Americanism, analysts say.

By ANNA FIFIELD and EMILY RAUHALA | 4:00AM EDT - Wednesday, September 27, 2017

This picture released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows a meeting at the Youth Park Open-Air Theater during an anti-U.S. rally in Pyongyang. — Photograph: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.
This picture released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows a meeting at the Youth Park Open-Air Theater
during an anti-U.S. rally in Pyongyang. — Photograph: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.


NORTH KOREA's bombastic threats are jangling nerves in both the United States and in Asia, with many analysts worried that the war of words between President Trump and Kim Jong Un will turn into an actual war — and possibly a nuclear one.

Both leaders are trying to outdo each other in the insult department, from “rocket man” and “dotard” to “little rocket man” and “the ringleader of aggressors”.

Although the threats are colorful — on both sides — experts on North Korea say they are in keeping with North Korea's history of bluster and do not signal a significant change in North Korea's thinking.

“I'm not concerned. North Korea likes colorful rhetoric and they always have,” said Tatiana Gabroussenko, a specialist on North Korean propaganda who teaches at Korea University in Seoul. “The problem now is Mr. Trump. He reacts, he answers, he tweets, so he's making it visible.”

Trump on Tuesday warned that if the United States decides to take military action against North Korea it would be “devastating”.

The comment prompted a rebuke from Pyongyang. “Trump declared a war against the DPRK through his wild remarks,” declared an editorial on Wednesday in Rodong Sinmun, the mouthpiece of the Korean Workers' Party.

“The army and people of the DPRK will surely make the old lunatic pay for his rude speech,” it said, using the official abbreviation for North Korea.

After Trump called Kim “rocket man” during his address to the United Nations General Assembly last week, the North Korean leader issued a highly unusual and direct statement about the American president, calling him “mentally deranged” and saying he would pay for the insult.

Trump doubled down, calling Kim “little rocket man”, leading the North Korean foreign minister to say the president had declared war and to issue a brazen threat to shoot down American war planes whether they are in North Korean airspace.

With American fighter jets now doing drills across South Korea, near the border with the North, on a regular basis, many experts are worried about the possibility for miscalculation or misunderstanding.

North Korea has continued churning out propaganda with its trademark braggadocio.

“U.S. imperialist warmongers are bluffing, being buoyed by war fever, after proposing ‘military counteraction’ against the DPRK again,” the North's state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported on Tuesday, using the country's official abbreviation. “Literally, the whole country is permeated with the spirit to annihilate war maniac and old lunatic Trump on the earth.”

These threats have gone the North Korean version of viral. More than 100,000 people took part in a regime-organized rally in Pyongyang on Saturday, to show they were ready to “remove the U.S. imperialists, the sworn enemy, from the globe,” KCNA reported.

Photographs from the rally showed orderly columns of men in workers' suits and students in white shirts and red ties, some holding signs declaring “The U.S. is the headquarters of evil”.

KCNA quoted one participant as saying that Trump's recent comments were the “most ignorant remarks ever known in history,” while another said they were “insane”.

But Gabroussenko said these kinds of demonstrations are not new in North Korea. The change has been in the attention being paid to the rhetoric, not in the rhetoric itself.

“You can go back to North Korean rhetoric from the 1950s and find this kind of anti-Americanism,” she said. “Anti-Americanism is the basis of North Korean culture and history.”


Spectators listen to a television news broadcast of a statement by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on a public television screen in Pyongyang on Friday. — Photograph: Ed Jones/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.
Spectators listen to a television news broadcast of a statement by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on a public television screen
in Pyongyang on Friday. — Photograph: Ed Jones/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.


Shen Dingli, deputy dean of the Institute of International Affairs at Fudan University in Shanghai, agreed the rhetoric was overblown.

“All these provocations are verbal,” Shen said, adding that Pyongyang does not want war.

“North Korea already threatened to attack Guam, but they didn't. Its artillery can blast Seoul and any of its nuclear weapons could turn northeast Asia upside down. But would they start a war first?” he said. “No, their nuclear weapons are for self-defense, and they are aware the United States will wipe them off from the Earth if they hit it.”

At the same time as North Korea has been making these incendiary statements about the United States, there has also been a remarkable — and almost entirely overlooked — outburst directed at China.

A commentary published during Friday on KCNA and signed by “Jong Phil” ostensibly attacked China’s “rude” and “shameless” media for saying North Korea deserved to be sanctioned by the United Nations over its nuclear weapons program.

But this was a veiled criticism of Chinese President Xi Jinping just three weeks before he opened the Congress of the Communist Party, which is held every five years. Adam Cathcart, a China scholar at Leeds University who reads North Korea's propaganda closely, believes that “Jong Phil” is a pen-name for Kim Jong Un himself, just as Mao and Stalin used aliases to write signed editorials.

This is the third such editorial by “Jong Phil” — which means “Righteous Pen” — this year, and the most pointed. The week after China backed tough new sanctions on North Korea through the U.N., it accused Chinese state media of “kowtowing to the ignorant acts of the Trump administration”.

North Korea was wondering how a fellow “socialist” country could “maliciously” collude with “the imperialists”, the editorial said.

“This leaves us thinking whether they should be entitled to enter the coming party conference hall only when they register the dirty reptile records of betraying the peoples of the two countries,” the editorial said, alluding to the upcoming Congress.

Cathcart said the statement was extraordinary, given that China is North Korea's biggest trading partner and protector. “They're basically accusing China of being revisionists who have no idea how happy the people of North Korea are,” he said.

Nor was it clear why North Korea would risk making such a statement at such an important time for the Chinese Communist Party. “They're basically telling China to go back to their socialist roots. What's the long-term tactical thinking here?”

But Cathcart was encouraged by recent efforts to forge new links with the Trump administration.

Shen added that all of this rhetoric is designed to increase the temperature and bring about a return to talks, albeit on North Korea's terms of being recognized as a nuclear weapons state.

That means the United States now has two options, he said: reject talks with North Korea and watch it build more and more nuclear weapons, or hold talks with North Korea so Pyongyang will suspend its nuclear development.

“The United States needs to choose the less harmful option of the two,” Shen said.


Anna Fifield reported from Bern, Switzerland. Rauhala reported from Beijing. Shirley Feng in Beijing contributed to this report.

• Anna Fifield is The Washington Post's bureau chief in Tokyo, focusing on Japan and the Koreas. She previously reported for the Financial Times from Washington DC, Seoul, Sydney, London and from across the Middle East.

• Emily Rauhala is a China Correspondent for The Washington Post. She was previously a Beijing-based correspondent for TIME, and an editor at the magazine's Hong Kong office.

__________________________________________________________________________

Related to this topic:

 • North Korea taps GOP analysts to better understand Trump and his messages


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/north-koreas-rhetoric-is-the-same-its-trumps-reaction-that-makes-this-different/2017/09/26/0efd40ae-a2f6-11e7-8c37-e1d99ad6aa22_story.html
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 

Social Buttons

aDjUsToR
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
*
Posts: 590


« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2017, 12:20:42 am »

Duly ignored. Too long. Too much lefty wank.
Feel free to summarise and add your own succinct comment. May read if I have time. Cheers.
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Open XNC2 Smileys
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Buy traffic for your forum/website
traffic-masters
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.125 seconds with 13 queries.