Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
Posts: 32232
Having fun in the hills!
|
|
« Reply #50 on: September 17, 2017, 03:58:59 pm » |
|
|
If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
|
|
|
Donald
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
Posts: 898
|
|
« Reply #51 on: September 17, 2017, 04:17:20 pm » |
|
..anyway sexy....did you bring a note to explain your absence 🙄
|
|
|
|
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
Posts: 32232
Having fun in the hills!
|
|
« Reply #52 on: September 17, 2017, 05:30:16 pm » |
|
He was probably in hospital getting his fucked-up brain fixed up.
Mind you, living in Woodville would be enough to fuck up anybody's brain.
|
If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
|
|
|
Donald
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
Posts: 898
|
|
« Reply #53 on: September 17, 2017, 07:19:27 pm » |
|
Nice to see you putting the effort to start off on a good note...don't put yourself out so much🙄
|
|
|
|
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
Posts: 32232
Having fun in the hills!
|
|
« Reply #54 on: September 18, 2017, 11:42:15 pm » |
|
from THE SUNDAY TIMES....Prince Charles: I won't live at Buckingham PalaceBy ROYA NIKKHAH - Royal Correspondent | 12:01AM - Sunday, 17 September 2017A source said that Prince Charles is no fan of “the big house”.THE PRINCE OF WALES wants to give up Buckingham Palace as a royal residence when he becomes king and is discussing plans to turn it into a more businesslike “monarchy HQ”, say royal insiders.
The Duke of Cambridge is also believed to agree that the palace is too large and costly for modern family life. Prince Charles thinks it could be made more commercially viable by opening it to the public on a larger scale than is possible with the Queen in residence.
The sources said Charles has told staff he does not intend to live at the palace. One said the prince was “very comfortable” at Clarence House, his London home formerly occupied by the Queen Mother, and both he and the Duchess of Cornwall are believed to be keen to remain living there.
“I know he is no fan of ‘the big house’, as he calls the palace,” said a source. “He doesn't see it as a viable future home or a house that’s fit for purpose in the modern world. He feels its upkeep, both from a cost and environmental perspective, is not sustainable.”
Staff have had informal discussions over the future use of the 775-room palace, which is mainly open to visitors from late July until October while the Queen takes her annual break at Balmoral. Under Charles the palace might become a museum open for longer periods with an exhibition dedicated to his mother's record-breaking reign.
“What's to say Buckingham Palace can't be opened to the public for at least six months, while keeping the state rooms pristine for use during big occasions?” noted one source. “That would be a modern approach and he'll be thinking along those lines.”
Another insider added: “It makes perfect sense commercially to offset the costs of running such a big place by extending availability to the ticket-buying public.”
A Clarence House spokesman said: “Buckingham Palace will remain the official London residence of the monarch.”A royal source said: “We have continued to say that Kensington Palace will be the Duke of Cambridge's residence throughout the next reign, whereupon he will move into Buckingham Palace.”
Sources have suggested that under Charles the palace would continue to host state occasions and diplomatic receptions and might provide space for his private office and communications team.
No major changes to the running of the palace are expected while the Queen is alive.
Claims that Charles may not live at Buckingham Palace emerged in 2011, when Andrew Marr published a book on the Queen ahead of her diamond jubilee.
The palace is undergoing a £369m taxpayer-funded refurbishment. The Treasury has said the building needs an “urgent overhaul” to prevent the risk of fire, flood and damage.
The Duke of York and the Earl and Countess of Wessex occupy flats there.
The discussion of the palace's future comes amid reports of differences between senior courtiers at Buckingham Palace and Clarence House over how to manage the transition of power between the Queen, 91, and Charles, 68.__________________________________________________________________________ Related to this topic:
• Prince Charles: The quirky man who would be kinghttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prince-charles-i-wont-live-at-buckingham-palace-9jxdvdqm9
|
If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
|
|
|
Donald
Part-Of-The-Furniture Member
Posts: 898
|
|
« Reply #55 on: September 19, 2017, 06:43:53 am » |
|
NEWS FLASH Britain is a free democracy and people can live where they wish...just like NZ😜
...but I do believe that people need to be forced to live in holes like Musturtun where there are a lot of undesirables residing🙄
|
|
|
|
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
Posts: 32232
Having fun in the hills!
|
|
« Reply #56 on: September 19, 2017, 11:44:46 am » |
|
A Google search fails to find any place called Musturtun.
Not only is there no such place in New Zealand (the country I live in), but Google doesn't even come up with a place called Musturtun anywhere in the world.
Either you are senile, or your brain is so fucked-up that you are simply making up imaginary placenames.
|
If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
|
|
|
|
|