Xtra News Community 2
March 29, 2024, 02:00:59 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Xtra News Community 2 — please also join our XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP.
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links BITEBACK! XNC2-BACKUP-GROUP Staff List Login Register  

HALLELUJAH… America edges towards a “genuine” leftie PREZ

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: HALLELUJAH… America edges towards a “genuine” leftie PREZ  (Read 546 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« on: January 16, 2016, 10:22:46 am »


from The Washington Post....

Finally, Hillary Clinton has a battle on her hands

By EUGENE ROBINSON | 10:00PM EST - Thursday, January 14, 2016

Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont) speaks during a campaign stop on January 14th at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. — Photograph: John Minchillo/Associated Press.
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont) speaks during a campaign stop on January 14th at Dartmouth College in Hanover,
New Hampshire. — Photograph: John Minchillo/Associated Press.


IF YOU thought the political landscape couldn't be more unsettled, think again. In the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, Bernie Sanders is surging. Hillary Clinton now faces not a coronation, not a cakewalk, but a contest — one she could lose.

Has there ever been a worse election to be an establishment candidate? Certainly not in my lifetime. When a pitchfork-populist billionaire is leading one party's race and a self-described democratic socialist is rapidly gaining ground in the other, I think it's safe to say we're somewhere we haven't been before.

For much of the past year, Clinton led Sanders in national polls by more than 20 points. Now, according to the RealClearPolitics average, her lead has shrunk to less than nine points — and the most recent survey, a CBS/New York Times poll released this week, showed just a seven-point gap.

State polls should make Clinton even more nervous. Her once-comfortable lead over Sanders in Iowa is now just four points, pretty much a toss-up. And in New Hampshire, Sanders — a longtime senator from next-door Vermont — leads Clinton by six points. It is within the realm of possibility that the presumptive Democratic nominee could lose both of the first two states. Then what?

It's tempting to look for parallels from 2008: Clinton had the backing of the party establishment, but an insurgent named Barack Obama beat her in Iowa and ran away with the nomination. However, the one bit of finger-in-the-wind punditry I'm comfortable dispensing this year is that comparisons with previous election cycles probably don't mean much.

Instead, we should start by looking at Sanders and his message. All along, his campaign has enjoyed less media coverage than it deserves. I believe many journalists accepted the conventional wisdom that he is too unpolished and too far to the left to win the nomination — despite evidence that substantial numbers of Democrats disagree.

Sanders's central campaign theme is inequality. Over the past four decades, he argues, “Wall Street and the billionaire class” have “rigged the rules to redistribute wealth and income to the wealthiest and most powerful people of this country.”

He proposes to do something about that — lots, in fact. He wants wealthy individuals and large corporations to “pay their fair share” in taxes. He wants to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour and put millions of people to work by spending $1 trillion over five years to renew the country's aging infrastructure.

Sanders denounces free-trade pacts, such as NAFTA — and President Obama's Trans-Pacific Partnership — contending they drive down wages and eliminate American jobs. On this question, he agrees almost word for word with Republican front-runner Donald Trump. As I said, this is not a normal election cycle.

Sanders wants to make tuition free at public colleges and universities. He wants universal child care and pre-kindergarten. He supports equal pay for women — by law — and a requirement that employers provide at least 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave and a minimum of two weeks' paid vacation.

And Sanders supports truly universal health care. He describes it as “Medicare for all” and notes that every other major industrialized nation considers medical care a right.

Any Clinton supporters looking for a reason to panic should consider the way the campaign attacked Sanders on health care this week. Chelsea Clinton, stumping for her mother in New Hampshire, charged that “Senator Sanders wants to dismantle Obamacare, dismantle the [Children's Health Insurance Program], dismantle Medicare and dismantle private insurance.” Hillary Clinton later doubled down, saying that “if you look at Senator Sanders's proposals going back nine times in Congress, that's exactly what he's proposed.”

Come on, be real. Sanders doesn't want to eliminate government health programs; he wants to combine them all into one comprehensive system. A more honest line of attack might be that Sanders has yet to spell out how he would pay for universal health care — or, for that matter, get it through a hostile Congress.

Such careful and misleading parsing of language can only be called Clintonesque and only be read as a danger sign. I can't help but recall how Bill Clinton invited a backlash in 2008 by calling the Obama candidacy a “fairy tale”. Maybe Hillary Clinton should try leaving the family at home.

Sanders still has an uphill battle, especially after Iowa and New Hampshire. But the Clinton campaign has a fight on its hands — and anything smacking of politics-as-usual is more likely to lose votes than win them.


• Eugene Robinson writes a twice-a-week column on politics and culture, contributes to the PostPartisan blog, and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Washington Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the newspaper's Style section.

__________________________________________________________________________

Read more on this topic:

 • E.J. Dionne Jr.: Capitalists should listen to Bernie Sanders

 • Paul Waldman: How Bernie Sanders is mainstreaming ‘democratic socialism’

 • The Washington Post's View: Bernie Sanders isn't as progressive as you think


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sanderss-run-is-no-fairy-tale/2016/01/14/0f0afc50-bb01-11e5-99f3-184bc379b12d_story.html
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2016, 10:23:00 am »


from The Washington Post....

Clinton's lead is evaporating, and anxious Democrats see 2008 all over again

By PAUL KANE | 10:49AM EST - Friday, January 15, 2016

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Iowa State University in Ames on January 12th. — Photograph: Patrick Semansky/Associated Press.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Iowa State University in Ames on January 12th.
 — Photograph: Patrick Semansky/Associated Press.


SOME leading Democrats are increasingly anxious about Hillary Clinton's prospects for winning the party's presidential nomination, warning that Senator Bernie Sanders's growing strength in early battleground states and strong fundraising point to a campaign that could last well into the spring.

What seemed recently to be a race largely controlled by Clinton has turned into a neck-and-neck contest with voting set to begin in less than three weeks.

On Capitol Hill and in state party headquarters, some Democrats worry that a Sanders nomination could imperil candidates down the ballot in swing districts and states. Others are expressing a sense of deja vu from 2008, when Clinton’s overwhelming edge cratered in the days before the Iowa caucuses.

Just as Barack Obama's stunning upset there helped assure Democrats in later states that a black man could win votes from whites and propelled him to victory in South Carolina and other places, so, too, could a Sanders victory on February 1st in Iowa and then on February 9th in New Hampshire ease some doubts about the viability of a self-described “democratic socialist,” some said.

“It's just like the weak spot for Barack Obama was his skin color, but he got cured of that in Iowa,” said Representative James E. Clyburn (Democrat-South Carolina), the party's leading African American in Congress.

“If [Sanders] comes out of Iowa and New Hampshire with big victories — if it's close in both places, that's one thing — but if he comes out of there with big victories, hey, man, it could very well be a new day,” Clyburn added.

One Clinton ally on Capitol Hill said some in the party are starting to seriously consider what it would mean for Democrats nationally if Sanders were to win.

“There's definitely an elevated concern expressed in the cloakroom and members-only elevators, and other places, about the impact of a Sanders nomination on congressional candidates,” Representative Steve Israel (Democrat-New York) said.

Israel, a former chairman of the Democrats' House campaign committee, said that a Sanders nomination “increases the level of anxiety that many of our candidates have in swing districts, where a Hillary Clinton nomination erases that anxiety.”

Sensing the tightening race, some state party officials have gone out of their way to keep the peace with supporters of Sanders, hoping to tap their energy and keep them activated for the general election campaign.

The re-evaluation of the Democratic primaries — which seemed destined for a Clinton coronation after she recovered from a damaging summertime slide amid controversy over her use of a private email system while secretary of state — comes as state and national surveys show her sliding fast once again.

A Des Moines Register survey of likely Iowa caucus voters released on Thursday showed a statistical dead heat, with Clinton at 42 percent and Sanders at 40. That marks a significant shift from a month ago when Clinton held a lead of 9 percentage points and saw her share of the vote at 48 percent. In New Hampshire, Sanders holds a commanding lead, 53 percent to 39 percent, according to a Monmouth University poll released this week.

Clinton and Sanders have escalated their attacks on each other, with each claiming to be the strongest general election candidate.

The new dynamic will be on display in South Carolina this weekend, when the Democratic candidates attend a party dinner and then a fish fry hosted by Clyburn ahead of their next debate Sunday night. The pre-debate events, expected to draw hundreds of activists, will serve as a chance for Sanders to prove that his campaign has an effective organization beyond the first two states.

“We're really at the front end of the process for states beyond Iowa and New Hampshire,” said Sanders adviser Tad Devine. “Part of the process is to convince people Bernie is a serious option, and doing well in early states helps with that.”

Clinton’s allies have said that they have always planned for a difficult primary season and that they expect their well-structured campaign to pay dividends when the race moves on to larger states with more diverse electorates than the two earliest states. They note that a recent trip to Oklahoma, part of the Super Tuesday bloc of 10 states on March 1st, demonstrated their campaign's long view of the race.

“From day one we have told everyone who will listen this would be a dogfight,” said Jerry Crawford, a longtime Clinton supporter in Iowa. “Hillary will continue to fight for every vote just as she has done since day one in Iowa, and I wouldn't trade places with any other campaign.”

Whether or not he wins, Sanders's rise has created challenges for party leaders by highlighting policy differences between the Democratic establishment and the party's support base.

Many of Sanders's proposals — Medicare for all, free college and breaking up the big banks — go beyond congressional Democrats' agenda but are now embraced by an ascendant activist wing of the party.

Those policy prescriptions win support in primaries, but many Democratic elites fear how they will play in a general election. At the same time, Democratic leaders know they can't afford to alienate an energized party base.

Some recent surveys suggest that Sanders is drawing support beyond the liberals and young voters who have been flocking to his rallies.

A Quinnipiac University poll early this month found Sanders trailing Clinton by an insignificant 2 percentage points among moderate and conservative Democrats, a sharp shift from Clinton’s 24 percentage-point lead among this group in December.

“Whatever the success that Senator Sanders, that Bernie Sanders has, I think it's important to recognize that his supporters are essential to our success in winning the White House,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (California) told reporters in the Capitol on Wednesday.

In the Senate, more than two-thirds of the Democratic caucus has endorsed Clinton. For now, the senators will remain calm, even if Clinton loses the first two states, according to a senior Democratic consultant working on Senate races.

However, full-fledged panic would set in if Clinton then loses the Nevada caucuses, wedged in between New Hampshire and South Carolina, the consultant said.

A Clinton defeat would complicate matters for one of the country's most vulnerable Democrats, Representative Cheri Bustos (Democrat-Illinois), who said on Thursday that much of her campaign strategy is based on energizing female voters with the potential of a woman at the top of the ticket in Clinton and a woman running for Senate, with Representative Tammy Duckworth (Democrat-Illinois) the leading candidate. “There's a lot of excitement about having a woman at the top of the ticket,” Bustos said in an interview on Thursday, declining to directly critique Sanders.

David Pepper, the Ohio Democratic Party chairman, said Clinton's infrastructure remains very strong, after her decisive victory over Obama there eight years ago.

But, he said, the Sanders team has been on the move. Pepper said he allowed Sanders's supporters to use party headquarters to host a national “meet-up,” and Pepper met with Sanders after 6,000 supporters attended a rally in Cleveland.

One of Sanders's supporters recently announced a challenge to Representative James B. Renacci (Republican-Ohio), a third-term Republican whose most recent re-election drew little competition.

“Our strategy of being intensely neutral and welcoming to all is paying off,” Pepper said.

Pepper's approach differs from that of the Democratic National Committee, whose leadership has been feuding with the Sanders campaign over debate scheduling and other areas where Sanders allies say the party has shown favoritism to Clinton.

The central fight among Democrats could come down to how voters will perceive Sanders, the wispy-haired 74-year-old former mayor of Burlington, Vermont, and whether they think his ideology could be a help or a hindrance.

“I'm deeply concerned that in November swing voters are not going to vote for a socialist,” said Israel, who is retiring.

Clyburn, however, said he wasn't convinced Sanders's ideology would be a drag, at least not in the primaries. He credited the senator for his consistent delivery over several decades of an agenda focused on erasing income inequality. “I'm out there, and I know what Democrats are feeling,” Clyburn said. “Democrats really feel strongly about this income inequality business. That is a big, big issue.”


Anne Gearan, John Wagner and Scott Clement contributed to this report.

• Paul Kane covers Congress and politics for The Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-lead-is-evaporating-and-anxious-democrats-see-2008-all-over-again/2016/01/15/ebd8db3c-bacc-11e5-99f3-184bc379b12d_story.html
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
reality
Guest
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2016, 11:05:52 am »

Poor Hillary looks so old.....how old is she? Roll Eyes
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2016, 12:05:20 pm »


Yep....Donald Trump is such a stupid blow-arse wanker who hates niggers African Americans, spiks Latinos, wogs Muslims and anybody else who isn't an old, white, gun-toting, bible-bashing retard that the only idiots who will vote for him will be old, white, gun-toting, bible-bashing Southerners and Mid-Westerners (and a few white retards from the intelligent parts of America), with the result that 99.9% of those niggers African Americans, spiks Latinos, wogs Muslims and ALL intelligent whites (as opposed to the retarded whites already mentioned) will vote for whoever is put up against Republican candidate Donald Trump. And voila....if that is Senator Bernie Sanders, then American will have its first “genuine” leftie PREZ.

Excellent stuff, eh? 

Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
guest49
Guest
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2016, 01:11:17 pm »


Yep....Donald Trump is such a stupid blow-arse wanker who hates niggers African Americans, spiks Latinos, wogs Muslims and anybody else who isn't an old, white, gun-toting, bible-bashing retard that the only idiots who will vote for him will be old, white, gun-toting, bible-bashing Southerners and Mid-Westerners (and a few white retards from the intelligent parts of America), with the result that 99.9% of those niggers African Americans, spiks Latinos, wogs Muslims and ALL intelligent whites (as opposed to the retarded whites already mentioned) will vote for whoever is put up against Republican candidate Donald Trump. And voila....if that is Senator Bernie Sanders, then American will have its first “genuine” leftie PREZ.

Excellent stuff, eh? 


Yep.  And he's the only one who's bid for power isn't controlled by the big corporates.  He funds himself.
He  also apparently speaks for the people, judging from his rankings in the polls.
Report Spam   Logged
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2016, 04:38:19 am »

Obama is a leftist and look at the mess he's made lol

But BSanders is an old retarded leftist white man without a clue
and he is going to spend a trillion dollars of whose money ?

maybe it's going to be borrowed from china lol

vote for him and get free KFC hahaha

HALLELUJAH FOR TRUMP LOL

« Last Edit: January 17, 2016, 05:01:59 am by Im2Sexy4MyPants » Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
reality
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2016, 06:30:51 am »

"HALLELUJAH… America edges towards a “genuine” leftie PREZ"


...ohh Jeeeezzzzuss...does this mean we will need to spend billions more on our defence forces due to American military spending cuts Shocked


...ok...lets start by selling kiwirail Wink
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2016, 10:08:05 am »


from The Washington Post....

Bill O'Reilly will flee to Ireland if Sanders is elected. He's in for a shock!

By HENRY FARRELL | Saturday, January 16, 2016

Bill O'Reilly, host of Fox News Channel's “The O'Reilly Factor”. — Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.
Bill O'Reilly, host of Fox News Channel's “The O'Reilly Factor”. — Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

BILL O'REILLY, the host of Fox News's “The O'Reilly Factor”, is threatening to flee the country if Senator Bernie Sanders (Independent-Vermont) — the self-described democratic socialist who is running for the Democratic Party nomination — is elected president. As quoted in the Huffington Post, O'Reilly said:

“If Bernie Sanders gets elected president, I'm fleeing … I'm going to Ireland. And they already know it. … I shouldn't say it publicly because that will get Sanders more votes,” he said. “But I'm not going to pay 90 percent of my income to that guy. I'm sorry. I'm not doing it.”

O'Reilly is proud of his Irish ancestry (as a recent emigrant from Ireland and current U.S. citizen, I heartily approve of these sentiments). But he probably doesn't know very much about what Ireland is like these days. From the perspective of its Western European neighbors, Ireland is a small, market-friendly, right-of-center country. But from the perspective of American conservatism, Ireland looks like a hellhole of socialism.


Can O’Reilly easily flee to Ireland?

It may be tougher than he thinks. It would seem that O'Reilly’s nearest Irish ancestor was his great-grandfather. This means that he misses the cut-off for automatic Irish citizenship by one generation. If you have one Irish grandparent, you qualify for Irish citizenship — but unless O’Reilly's grandparent or parent formally applied, he's out of luck. He does have a second possibility though — paying to become a citizen. Ireland, like many other countries, provides citizenship to individuals who are willing to invest or donate a large sum of money to the benefit of the Irish economy.

Ireland is not a conservative paradise: Look at the taxes.

What would O'Reilly get in return for his money? First off, a tax system which is not all that different from the U.S. tax system for top earners, and arguably a little less favorable. The effective top Irish income tax rate is a little over half of income.

In the rather unlikely event that Sanders was elected president in a landslide of socialist enthusiasm, turning the Senate and the House socialist, and introducing punitive taxes to impoverish rich Fox News opinionators, O'Reilly would still be in trouble. Even if he lived in Ireland, he would have difficulty avoiding U.S. taxes unless he renounced his U.S. citizenship. The United States continues to regard U.S. expatriates as taxpayers, no matter where they reside. Ireland and the United States have a double taxation treaty, to prevent people being taxed twice for the same income — this might provide some loopholes for royalties and the like, but probably not enough to make an enormous difference. O'Reilly would likely find himself paying to support Sanders's socialist American utopia from overseas.


Ireland has gun control. Serious gun control.

Bill O'Reilly has strong views on his right to own guns to defend himself under the Second Amendment:

“I have a right to protect myself, because there are crazed animals like the guy in Oregon … There are people like that who will come after innocent people for no reason. And you are going to deny me protection? If I live out in a rural Oregon … where the nearest cop is 40 miles away? I can't have a gun to protect my family?”

The Irish attitude to guns is going to be a serious culture shock. First, he'll be far worse off than he would be in rural Oregon. While there will surely be cops closer than 40 miles away, those cops will almost certainly be unarmed. In Ireland, police only carry arms under special circumstances. Most Irish police officers don't even have firearms training.

Furthermore, gun ownership is highly restricted in Ireland. People have to apply for a license to own a gun, and are likely to be refused under many circumstances. Furthermore, there are heavy restrictions on kinds of guns that they are allowed to own — roughly speaking, guns for sport and hunting (sports pistols; shotguns; some kinds of rifles) are okay, but handguns of the kind that O'Reilly could use for “self-defense” are not, let alone automatic weapons. Gun rights are not a topic of political debate in Ireland — Ireland's most conservative party, which is now the majority party in the government, has just introduced new restrictions, without any significant public opposition.


Ireland has socialized medicine.

O'Reilly denounces Obamacare as ‘socialism’ because it uses taxpayers' money to subsidize the poor. The Irish health-care system does the same thing, on a much larger scale, with a hospital system that is directly run by the government. In Ireland, hospital doctors are government employees (although many senior doctors earn substantial incomes on the side from private practice). Everyone in Ireland is entitled to free basic health care in hospitals, and low income people get medical cards entitling them to free doctors' visits and many other services.

This system is far from perfect, which means that many middle-class and upper-middle-class people supplement it with private health insurance (so that, for example, they do not have to wait long times for some surgical procedures). Even so, it's socialized medicine on a scale which would be politically unthinkable in America. Ireland also has welfare benefits for the unemployed which are not notably generous by European standards, but are wildly permissive in comparison to their U.S. equivalents.


SOCIALIST PARADISE: A view of the town of Clifden along the famous scenic Sky Road on the Coast of Connemara, in western Ireland. — Photograph: Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post.
SOCIALIST PARADISE: A view of the town of Clifden along the famous scenic Sky Road on the Coast of Connemara, in western Ireland.
 — Photograph: Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post.


There are other ways in which Ireland is more congenial to conservatives like O'Reilly. Most obviously, abortion is far more heavily curtailed in Ireland than the United States (although the conservative party leading government has promised to liberalize Ireland's abortion laws this year).

Even though Ireland is a conservative country by West European standards, it's far, far to the left of U.S. conservative preferences on many key issues.

If O'Reilly really thinks that Ireland is a good alternative to a Sanders-led America, it's probably because he's unfamiliar with what Ireland is really like as a country. If a putative Sanders administration were somehow able successfully to introduce Irish-style health care, an Irish-style welfare state and Irish-style gun control, it would be viewed by conservatives as a socialist revolution.


Henry Farrell is associate professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University. He works on a variety of topics, including trust, the politics of the Internet and international and comparative political economy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/01/16/bill-oreilly-will-flee-to-ireland-if-sanders-is-elected-hes-in-for-a-shock
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2016, 10:17:02 am »


I'm still pissing myself with   over this stupid rightie moron who is so dumb that he would flee the United States under a socialist president to seek refuge in Ireland, which is positively COMMUNIST compared to what any socialist US prez would be.

Faaaaaaark.....righties are stupid dumbarses alright!! 







Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
reality
Guest
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2016, 12:06:51 pm »

kj.."Faaaaaaark.....righties are stupid dumbarses alright!!"


....Yes...that must be why they are all so poor Tongue
Report Spam   Logged
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2016, 11:28:02 am »


from The Washington Post....

How Bernie Sanders's ‘political revolution’ would change the nation

By DAVID A. FAHRENTHOLD | 12:53PM EST - Monday, January 18, 2016

Sanders speaks during Sunday night's debate in Charleston, South Carolina. — Photograph: Mic Smith/Associated Press.
Sanders speaks during Sunday night's debate in Charleston, South Carolina. — Photograph: Mic Smith/Associated Press.

WHAT is Bernie Sanders talking about when he says he wants a “political revolution”?

The answer is a series of policies that would offer vast new government-funded benefits to individual Americans, including health insurance, paid maternity leave and free tuition at public colleges.

To make those things possible, Sanders — a Vermont senator, “democratic socialist” and Democratic presidential candidate — would impose a variety of new taxes on the wealthy, on corporations and on Wall Street trade.

He also would give the federal government a new level of control over the college experience, the price of prescription drugs and child care — by making these sectors of the economy far more dependent on federal money.

Even if Sanders does win the White House, almost all of his big ideas are likely to be dead on arrival in a Republican-controlled Congress.

His response is that, if his political revolution is for real, then it can change Congress, too.

Below, some of Sanders's biggest ideas:


1. Government health insurance for all.

Sanders wants to eliminate private health insurance and in effect make the federal government everyone's insurance company. He has long called his single-payer idea “Medicare for All”, to capitalize on the popularity of the federally run Medicare insurance for seniors.

For months of this campaign, however, Sanders declined to spell out how it would work. He finally did, just hours before Sunday's fourth Democratic debate.

He said his plan would cover a wide variety of services, including in many cases more than private insurers cover now. And it would save them money at the same time: He says middle-class families would save $5,800 a year under his system.

“Bernie's plan means no more co-pays, no more deductibles and no more fighting with insurance companies when they fail to pay for charges,” his campaign says.

The plan would cost $1.38 trillion per year, Sanders says. He would pay for it by raising taxes on the rich, including higher rates of tax on capital gains, dividends and large inheritances. He also would impose new income-based “premium” taxes on employers and individuals (although he says the new taxes would be smaller than the new savings).

But Sanders's plan has not answered a key question: How would he make his system run so cheaply, while also promising to give Americans an end to fights over what their insurance covers? In theory, single-payer systems can use their monopoly power to say no: no to higher payments to hospitals, doctors and drug companies, and no to treatments and drugs that don't seem worth the cost. That saves money, but it also angers customers and squeezes hospitals and doctors.

“Sanders has offered a puppies-and-rainbows approach to single-payer,” wrote Ezra Klein at Vox.com, punting the hardest questions to a later time.


2. Free tuition at public colleges.

Sanders wants to eliminate tuition fees at all public colleges and universities. He would do that by having the federal government pay most of the tuition fees instead — with states also required to pay part of the tab.

His plan would not pay for tuition at private colleges. It also would not cover all non-tuition expenses at public colleges, such as books and room and board. But it would help students pay those costs with expanded work-study programs, federal grants and lower rates on student loans.

His plan would make the federal government the nation's main customer for higher education, and give the government increased power to dictate what colleges spend money on. For instance, Sanders thinks that student centers and sports stadiums are not a good use of money, and has written legislation that would prohibit colleges from using federal tuition payments to build them.

The cost of this plan, which Sanders estimates at $75 billion per year, would be funded by a new tax that takes a tiny slice of all Wall Street trades. Sanders thinks this tax would be a good thing in itself, by reducing what he calls “speculation” and high-volume “flash” trading on Wall Street.


3. Break up the biggest banks.

Sanders wants to reinstate a version of the Glass-Steagall Act, a Depression-era law that separated commercial banking and investment banking — intended to keep bankers from losing their depositors' money in risky Wall Street bets.

He also wants to go further, and “break up” the biggest financial institutions on Wall Street. Sanders's idea is for the Treasury secretary to compile a list of institutions whose size makes them “too big to fail.” They would then be cut off from emergency lending from the federal government, and federal regulators would be charged with breaking them up.

The new broken-up companies would be small enough “so that their failure would no longer cause a catastrophic effect on the United States or global economy without a taxpayer bailout,” according to the text of a bill Sanders wrote in 2015. He believes that, as president, he would not need Congress to act to use this power.


4. New taxes on the rich and corporations, which pay for new jobs and new aid.

Sanders wants to use the government to reduce the gap between the nation's richest and poorest — by using taxes on the former to pay for new aid and jobs programs for the latter.

In particular, he wants a five-year $1 trillion program to rebuild infrastructure such as roads, bridges and airports. Sanders thinks this would employ 13 million people. He also wants to spend $5.5 billion a year on a program to employ young people.

The infrastructure plan would be funded, Sanders says, partly by taxing money that U.S. companies now keep in international tax havens. The youth jobs program would be paid for by raising taxes on “carried interest” income for individuals, a type of income common among investors that is taxed at a lower rate than wages.

Sanders also wants to increase the Social Security benefits paid to seniors, by an average of $65 per month. He would do this by raising the “cap” on Social Security taxes, which means that now high earners pay Social Security taxes only on their first $118,500 of income.

Sanders also wants to raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $15 per hour over several years.


5. Guaranteed parental leave.

Sanders wants to guarantee paid family or medical leave for all Americans. It would be funded by new taxes on income, paid by employers as well as employees. Sanders has signed on to a plan from Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (Democrat-New York) that would have the Social Security Administration run the system. One major purpose of this legislation is to make sure new parents can take 12 weeks of leave without giving up a paycheck.

Sanders says he wants to make universal child care and pre-kindergarten available to all Americans, “regardless of income.” He has not released more details of his plan.

On the issue of abortion, Sanders says he wants to increase funding for Planned Parenthood. He also says he will nominate only Supreme Court justices who will preserve the Roe vs. Wade decision that made abortion legal.


6. A “path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants.

Sanders would expand President Obama's executive actions so that all undocumented immigrants who've been in the country for more than five years could be protected from deportation. In all, Sanders says, almost 9 million immigrants would be eligible to apply for protection.

In addition, Sanders wants to create a “roadmap” to give all 11 million undocumented immigrants an opportunity to become legal permanent residents, then citizens. He is not specific about the kind of background check he would require as part of this process. But he says that “nonviolent individuals with prior contacts with our criminal justice system” should still be able to apply.


7. A carbon tax to fight climate change.

Sanders would try to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by imposing a “carbon tax” that would make companies pay as they pollute. Sanders says this idea — discussed for years, but often dismissed as politically impossible — could raise billions, and push the economy toward cleaner sources of energy. It also could raise prices on a variety of goods, as polluters pass the tax on to customers. Sanders would give some of the tax money to low-income families in rebates to soften the blow.

• David A. Fahrenthold covers Congress for The Washington Post. He has been at the Post since 2000, and previously covered (in order) the D.C. police, New England, and the environment.

__________________________________________________________________________

Read more on this topic:

 • Bernie Sanders's health-care plan is the biggest attack on the rich of this campaign

 • The 4th Democratic debate transcript, annotated: Who said what and what it meant

 • The Daily 202: Bernie Sanders won the Democratic debate, say pundits and social media

 • How Clinton and Sanders are trying to define their party — as Iowa looms


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-bernie-sanderss-political-revolution-would-change-the-nation/2016/01/18/4c1c13fa-bde4-11e5-9443-7074c3645405_story.html
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Crusader
Guest
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2016, 11:49:22 am »

His policies sound pretty good. However I am against Citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Purely because I was born in the States and I enquired about citizenship for my daughters of which was rejected. Therefore the way I view it, is that my daughter have more rights to citizenship through their lineage than a bunch of illegal aliens.

Perhaps he should amend this policy to those with lineage ties to the US gets citizenship.
Report Spam   Logged
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2016, 04:26:43 pm »

Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2016, 02:51:23 pm »


from The Washington Post....

Sanders defeats Clinton in decisive New Hampshire primary victory

9:30PM EST - Tuesday, February 09, 2016
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2016, 07:47:58 pm »

vomit 
Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2016, 03:34:39 am »

vomit 


Why don't you use the vomit Smiley?

It's right there amongst all the others in that Smileys Menu....
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2016, 02:42:34 pm »


Mark Morford

Feel the Bern or Give 'em Hill, but please, chill out

By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist | 3:51PM PST - Wednesday, February 10, 2016

More establishment than anyone wants, more revolutionary than many imagine.
More establishment than anyone wants, more revolutionary than many imagine.

HOW TO put this delicately? With all due respect and while hoping to avoid kicking the political hornet's nest, all over again?

Oh, screw it: Chill the hell out, rabid Bernie evangelists.

Believe me, I get it. Bernie is awesome. Bernie is neat. Bernie could, bewildered Fates allowing and if New Hampshire is any indication and it's almost certainly not but life is weird and stranger things have happened — Bernie could go all the way. And lo, it would be amazing.

But hear this now, hardcore Sanders zealots: it's become jarringly evident that many of you are losing perspective, becoming unhinged, veering way too close, in your savage anti-Hillary screeds, pro grumpy-old-populist obsessiveness and manic refusal to acknowledge historical context, toward raging fundamentalism.

You know, like an NRA fanatic. Like a Trump rage-aholic. A Mormon homophobe. A Planned Parenthood firebomber. Beware.

You are not them. Act not like them. Chill the fṳck out. Widen your lens. See the larger play. Befriend your “opponent”. Unclench your zealotry, just a little. This is the only way. The other way? Pure poison.

Let me be clear: I'm thrilled that Sanders won New Hampshire. I'm thrilled that Hillary will be the (likely) nominee. I'm thrilled that the GOP continues to eat itself alive. I have no problem with all these statements being true, simultaneously, in turns, over and over again. But maybe that's just me.


He's great. He's awesome. He's nutty radical inspiring crazy. He has a very slim chance of going all the way. But savage, blind hatred of Hillary on the part of his most devout supporters isn't going to help.
He's great. He's awesome. He's nutty radical inspiring crazy. He has a very slim chance
of going all the way. But savage, blind hatred of Hillary on the part of his most devout
supporters isn't going to help.


But it's been a difficult thing to witness, this blinding hate, this savage intolerance, this strange moral panic I've seen lately, springing up all over my social media feeds, in articles and discussion threads and even among my activist friends, much of it — though certainly not all — coming from Bernie's most virulent supporters (note: not ‘Bernie bros’, just bullies) and all of it aimed not at Trump, not at the GOP, but squarely at the most yawningly obvious target of all: Hillary Clinton.

No mere dislike, this. No mere policy disagreement or bantering about who's the real “progressive”. This is far uglier. It's mean and it's low and it's shameful to see. It's as though a bunch of devout Bernie fire-breathers have taken a page from the GOP handbook and have decided to brutalize Clinton using the most demeaning, hateful language possible, hurling forth all kinds of specious evidence to dehumanize her, all while pretending it's in service of elevating and lionizing Bernie.

It's a toxic strategy. It's also sort of a lie.

Who's the better candidate, really? More skilled? More electable? Stronger on policy? More revolutionary? Not the point. Not this column. From where I sit and I don't care who knows it, both are terrific, hugely intelligent, enormously flawed, historically unique, fascinating candidates, for widely different reasons and some not so different at all. Their voting records in the Senate are nearly identical. Both have put forth multiple excellent, bold policy proposals, also exceedingly similar, often varying only in degrees of No Way In Hell Will This Ever Happen. Either one will serve us well, with multiple caveats and in very different ways.

I am not decrying impassioned support, either. I'm all for political idealism and fire. Most of Bernie's supporters are wonderfully inspired and eager for reasonable, mature debate. And Hillary certainly has her own problems with over-zealous supporters, particularly those of the uber-feminist variety, some who've taken to shaming any liberal female who dares not support the female candidate, because female, end of discussion. Has Hillary overplayed the gender card? Maybe. Does she have the right to use it? Absolutely. Is there a bit of a backlash going on? Sort of.

But from what I'm seeing, even Hillary's most impassioned supporters are coming nowhere near the vicious character assassinations and outright hate speech being slung by some of Bernie's most enraged acolytes. Simply put: Hillary deserves serious critique. She does not deserve crass, wholesale slaughter, from within her own party. It's divisive and cruel and serves nothing. Leave it to the GOP.

The over-reach is partly understandable; Bernie is the underdog, the longshot, the nutty socialist radical. He's blunt and unflashy. His supporters have to be louder and more aggressive, just to be heard, to be taken seriously, particularly amidst the powerful whitewashery of Hillary's entrenched political machinery.


Smiling, at last. Worthy of championing. Unworthy of savaging his opponent, to do it.
Smiling, at last. Worthy of championing. Unworthy of savaging his opponent, to do it.

Then again, Bernie also gets to enjoy a different sort of advantage, and it's only partly that he gets to be a white male.

It's this: No candidate, no political figure in your lifetime has been more vilified, more hated upon, more systematically demonized, largely by the old white male Republican guard but often by everyday liberals and common sexists, than Hillary Clinton, largely due to her gender, her intelligence, her past, who she married. We have all, to one degree or another, been pre-coded, predisposed to mistrust her, dislike her, doubt her motives.

Of course, some of that is entirely justified; She is the Establishment. She is political cronyism and corporate entitlement. I get it. But ask yourself this, fanatical Berners: how much of your view of her is the result of decades of relentless right-wing sexism and savagery, and how much is honest, fair critique? Can you differentiate? I usually can't. But it's absolutely worth trying. What's that you say? You don't think she even deserves fair critique, just straight-up condemnation? You're part of the problem.

Sanders, OTOH, suffers no such entrenched prejudice. He's a ‘revolutionary’ blank slate. He's been operating so far in the background, and for so long, he's never had the pleasure of being hated and demeaned for everything he is and everything he stands for, from his spouse to his clothes, his hair to his ankles, his wrinkles to his tone of voice. In short: He's never had to endure even a fraction of the systemic misogyny and vicious public dissection Hillary has, for decades, and it's still going strong.

Result: Berners are free to project onto him their most devout, savior-of-the-nation fantasias and wild-eyed ideologies, with minimal critical analysis or sociocultural perspective. Can he fulfill even a small percentage of those fantasies? Impossible to know. But it sure is fun to imagine. Can Hillary enact most of her policies and agenda items? Not even a question.

Let's not get carried away. I am no HRC apologist. I do not yet feel the Bern. They're both brilliant. They're both totally insane. They're both great for the Democratic party overall. Support whichever you like. Get passionate. Be critical. Be less furiously certain you know what you think you know — that would certainly help.

But when one gets the nom, get over your sour disappointment ASAP and support him/her with all you've got — not merely because either one will be strange, fascinating, transformative president, but also because the alternatives are so toxic and repugnant as to be threatening to all of human life as we know it. I mean, holy hell. Isn't it obvious?


Email: Mark Morford

Mark Morford on Twitter and Facebook.

http://blog.sfgate.com/morford/2016/02/10/feel-the-bern-or-give-em-hill-but-please-chill-out
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2016, 08:47:35 am »

Bernie Sanders a Bum Who Didn’t Earn His First Steady Paycheck Until Age 40 Then Wormed His Way Into Politics


What a shock.
Bernie Sanders was a bum who didn’t earn a steady paycheck until he was 40 years old. He was a slob who lived in a shack with a dirt floor. He later wrote about masturbation and rape for left-wing rags for $50 a story. The Socialist then wormed his way into politics.
bernie sanders
Bernie had his electricity cut off a lot so he’d run an extension cord down to the basement. He couldn’t pay his bills.

And today he’s running for president so he can take your money and redistribute it.
Investor’s Business Daily reported:

Sanders spent most of his life as an angry radical and agitator who never accomplished much of anything. And yet now he thinks he deserves the power to run your life and your finances — “We will raise taxes;” he confirmed Monday, “yes, we will.”

One of his first jobs was registering people for food stamps, and it was all downhill from there.

Sanders took his first bride to live in a maple sugar shack with a dirt floor, and she soon left him. Penniless, he went on unemployment. Then he had a child out of wedlock. Desperate, he tried carpentry but could barely sink a nail. “He was a shi**y carpenter,” a friend told Politico Magazine. “His carpentry was not going to support him, and didn’t.”

Then he tried his hand freelancing for leftist rags, writing about “masturbation and rape” and other crudities for $50 a story. He drove around in a rusted-out, Bondo-covered VW bug with no working windshield wipers. Friends said he was “always poor” and his “electricity was turned off a lot.” They described him as a slob who kept a messy apartment — and this is what his friends had to say about him.

The only thing he was good at was talking … non-stop … about socialism and how the rich were ripping everybody off. “The whole quality of life in America is based on greed,” the bitter layabout said. “I believe in the redistribution of wealth in this nation.”

So he tried politics, starting his own socialist party. Four times he ran for Vermont public office, and four times he lost — badly. He never attracted more than single-digit support — even in the People’s Republic of Vermont. In his 1971 bid for U.S. Senate, the local press said the 30-year-old “Sanders describes himself as a carpenter who has worked with ‘disturbed children.’ ” In other words, a real winner.

He finally wormed his way into the Senate in 2006, where he still ranks as one of the poorest members of Congress. Save for a municipal pension, Sanders lists no assets in his name. All the assets provided in his financial disclosure form are his second wife’s. He does, however, have as much as $65,000 in credit-card debt.

Sure, Sanders may not be a hypocrite, but this is nothing to brag about. His worthless background contrasts sharply with the successful careers of other “outsiders” in the race for the White House, including a billionaire developer, a world-renowned neurosurgeon and a Fortune 500 CEO.

The choice in this election is shaping up to be a very clear one. It will likely boil down to a battle between those who create and produce wealth, and those who take it and redistribute it.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/02/bernie-sanders-a-bum-who-didnt-earn-his-first-paycheck-until-age-40/





The Hillary Chronicles: Candidate Clinton displays the morals of a crook



the morals of a crook
by Andrew Napolitano

The bad news has continued to cascade onto the Hillary Clinton for President campaign, and none of it has anything to do with Clinton’s opinions on issues. It all is about her fitness for office.

Since Labor Day, we have learned that the folks into whose hands Clinton reposed her computer server for safe keeping do not believe it has been wiped clean of all emails, as her lawyer told a federal judge it was. That means the 33,000 emails she thought she destroyed  probably still could be recovered. What will they reveal?

And we learned earlier this week that of the emails released thus far -- those Clinton did not attempt to destroy -- there is a five- month gap for which no emails were produced. For a government official who sent or received about 15,000 emails a year, five months of silence is not believable. Two of those months followed the assassination of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya in Benghazi. Where are her emails from that time period?

Why should you care about this?

Like a crook, Hillary Clinton breaks the law, lies about why she broke the law, sees no wrong-doing in her ways, and expects to get away with it.

It is now well established that when she was secretary of state, Clinton refused to use government computers or servers for any of her emails -- governmental and personal. She kept all of her emails from the government. That constitutes theft of government property, as it violates a federal law that mandates that the government owns the emails its employees generate in their work, and if an employee comingles her personal emails with the government’s, the government owns those, as well.

Clinton said she did this because she believed it would be easier to do all emailing from one hand-held device, even though she eventually used four devices. Instead of accepting a secure government-issued BlackBerry, she had aides buy an off-the-shelf BlackBerry. We now know that she was trying to conceal her Middle Eastern escapades -- secret wars and personal approvals of arms dealings to terrorists -- from the president, from FBI investigators, from State Department colleagues, and from history.

But her most serious crime is her failure to safeguard national secrets. The secretary of state is the nation’s chief diplomat. She deals with military, diplomatic, and national security secrets every day. One of the reasons government employees are required by law to use a government-issued hand-held device and a government-owned and secured server for their official work is to safeguard the national security secrets that pass to and from them by securing their emails with government software and encryption.

Why should you care about this?

When she became secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton told the president she wanted to hire her friend Sidney Blumenthal -- whom the press has nicknamed ‘the prince of darkness’ and ‘grassy knoll’ -- to work as her senior adviser. The president himself blocked the toxic Blumenthal from working for the State Department, whereupon Clinton had her husband’s foundation hire him. She then proceeded to engage with him as if he were a senior adviser and to share top secret emails with him. Blumenthal did not have any national security clearance, and it was a felony for Clinton to share government secrets with him.

Why should you care about this?

You should care about this because Clinton is running for president. Yet, she is uniquely unqualified for the presidency because she is the moral equivalent of a common crook.

Like a crook, she breaks the law, lies about why she broke the law, sees no wrong-doing in her ways, and expects to get away with it. Though millions of Democrats have dreamed of her in the White House, and are apparently willing to overlook her crimes, her support is beginning to erode.

How can a person with the morals of a crook be the chief law enforcement officer in the land, the commander in chief of the military, and the repository of more lawful power than any person on the planet? How can she be entrusted with national security secrets in the future when she has failed to safeguard them in the past?

Because Blumenthal lacked the government’s encryption on his email devices and server, he was hacked by foreign agents. Because he was hacked, Clinton was hacked. Because she was hacked, some of the nation’s military, diplomatic, and national security secrets in a dangerous world are now in dangerous hands.

A sailor faces 20 years in federal prison for taking a selfie in front of a radar screen and sending it to his girlfriend, and a courageous Marine who used his Gmail account in an emergency to warn his superiors of the near proximity of an assassin faces 20 years for failing to keep the email about the assassin in a secure venue. Then-CIA Director David Petraeus kept secrets in an unlocked desk drawer in his home, which was guarded 24/7, and he pleaded guilty to failure to safeguard secrets.

Clinton’s crimes are far worse, but is she any different legally? Can she get away with her crimes because of her last name? She seems to think so. Last week she apologized for making poor choices -- not crimes, but poor choices. And she has given no coherent legal justification for all this.

While all this is going on, Vice President Biden is dreaming about his boss’s job because he and many Democrats have come to the realization that Hillary Clinton is utterly unworthy of their trust, and power in her hands might be used for unlawful purposes.


Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/09/17/hillary-chronicles-candidate-with-morals-crook.html
Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2016, 11:59:50 am »


Feel the Bern
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2016, 08:28:27 pm »

Stupid ignorant Sanders Supporters All They Want Is Free Stuff

Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2016, 05:39:12 pm »


GO BERNIE....



from Associated Press....

Exit poll: Cruz wins on Trump fear; Sanders on excitement

Cruz, Sanders emerge victorious in Wisconsin primaries


Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2016, 05:55:54 pm »



(click on the photograph to read the news story)
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2016, 07:12:07 pm »

america is in over 19 trillion dollars in debt so how is burnie going to pay for all the sweets he's offering

think of all that leftist obama promised the us and look a where obama started he was a shit stirrer in chicago
who offered hope and change but we all now know he was full of bullshit and burnie will end up the same

take a peek at this and then tell me what hell bernie sanders can do about this problem

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 07:22:22 pm by Im2Sexy4MyPants » Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP
Kiwithrottlejockey
Admin Staff
XNC2 GOD
*
Posts: 32232


Having fun in the hills!


« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2016, 07:33:42 pm »

america is in over 19 trillion dollars in debt so how is burnie going to pay for all the sweets he's offering


How is Trump going to pay for the wall now that Mexico has told him to go and fuck himself and refused to pay for it?

That wall is going to cost considerably more than anything Bernie has promised.

Naturally, stupid Trump supporters are too mentally defective to work that one out!
Report Spam   Logged

If you aren't living life on the edge, you're taking up too much space! 
Im2Sexy4MyPants
Absolutely Fabulously Incredibly Shit-Hot Member
*
Posts: 8271



WWW
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2016, 09:24:48 pm »

do you have any proof about how burnie can turn a bankrupt nation into a leftist utopia without taking more cash off the people
does he have a magic wand


Report Spam   Logged

Are you sick of the bullshit from the sewer stream media spewed out from the usual Ken and Barby dickless talking point look a likes.

If you want to know what's going on in the real world...
And the many things that will personally effect you.
Go to
http://www.infowars.com/

AND WAKE THE F_ _K UP

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Open XNC2 Smileys
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 14 queries.