hey Prof Moon what are the stats for "white child abuse " did you compare that when you were doing your resaearch ?
An Auckland academic says the increasing use of the term "Maori child abuse" is fuelling racism.Auckland University of Technology Maori history professor Paul Moon said in the last 18 months the racially-charged term has crept into public and Government use.
"The Government has even commissioned reports on Maori child abuse so it's had the effect of entrenching that label."
Moon said there is no such thing as Maori child abuse or Pakeha child abuse.
"By putting the word 'Maori' in front of it, a stereotype is created which is inaccurate and dangerous," he said.
"The vast majority of Maori parents, like the vast majority of all other parents, do a fantastic job of raising their children."
Moon called on the Government and media to stop referring to "Maori child abuse" when discussing New Zealand's problem with abuse.
He accepted Maori child abuse rates were higher than Pakeha.
However, he said many Maori parents felt unfairly labelled as child abusers, despite being good parents.
"Child abuse is a crime, but it is applied to a whole ethnic group."
"You don't see any newspaper article about 'Pakeha' corporate crime. And if you did there would be an uproar because you're racially profiling a whole ethnic group based on a tiny percentage."
He said New Zealand has a history of stereotyping ethnicities, including the Japanese 1940s and Polynesians in the 1970s.
Moon said he sees a similar pattern recurring in the debate about Maori child abuse.
"By highlighting the ethnicity in this way, a stigma is placed on all Maori parents, and there is growing anecdotal evidence of this. To some extent, all Maori parents are tarred with this brush."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6192459/Maori-child-abuse-label-hurting-parents-academic