Xtra News Community 2

General Category => General Forum => Topic started by: Kiwithrottlejockey on May 13, 2020, 11:19:12 pm



Title: War between America and China…
Post by: Kiwithrottlejockey on May 13, 2020, 11:19:12 pm

from The Washington Post…

Think we have military primacy over China? Think again.

A new book lays down some hard truths about our defense systems.

By DAVID IGNATIUS | 8:01PM EDT — Tuesday, May 12, 2020

(https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/YLKXJUEUSII6VEOXZ5CCHVDWQM.jpg&w=888) (https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/YLKXJUEUSII6VEOXZ5CCHVDWQM.jpg&w=1440)
An aerial view of the Pentagon in October 2018. — Photograph: Saul Loeb/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.

HERE'S A FACT that ought to startle every American who assumes that because we spend nearly $1 trillion each year on defense, we have primacy over our emerging rival, China.

“Over the past decade, in U.S. war games against China, the United States has a nearly perfect record: We have lost almost every single time.”

That's a quote from a new book (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT9&lpg=PT9&dq=%E2%80%9COver+the+past+decade,+in+U.S.+war+games+against+China,+the+United+States+has+a+nearly+perfect+record:+We+have+lost+almost+every+single+time.%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=xblLGZDMmk&sig=ACfU3U3tX42kTtas0Hb1YKt4wvF0pOQh1A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiOt9msgK_pAhVPhXIEHWk6D50Q6AEwAHoECAEQAQ#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9COver%20the%20past%20decade%2C%20in%20U.S.%20war%20games%20against%20China%2C%20the%20United%20States%20has%20a%20nearly%20perfect%20record%3A%20We%20have%20lost%20almost%20every%20single%20time.%E2%80%9D&f=false) called The Kill Chain: Defending America in the Future of High-Tech Warfare (https://www.amazon.com/dp/031653353X), the most provocative critique of U.S. defense policy I've read in years. It's written by Christian Brose (https://www.aspeninstitute.org/our-people/chris-brose/), former staff director of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a close adviser to late senator John McCain (Republican-Arizona). The book isn't just a wake-up call, it's a fire alarm in the night.

Brose explains (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT9&lpg=PT9&dq=%E2%80%9COver+the+past+decade,+in+U.S.+war+games+against+China,+the+United+States+has+a+nearly+perfect+record:+We+have+lost+almost+every+single+time.%E2%80%9D&source=bl&ots=xblLGZDMmk&sig=ACfU3U3tX42kTtas0Hb1YKt4wvF0pOQh1A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiOt9msgK_pAhVPhXIEHWk6D50Q6AEwAHoECAEQAQ#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9COver%20the%20past%20decade%2C%20in%20U.S.%20war%20games%20against%20China%2C%20the%20United%20States%20has%20a%20nearly%20perfect%20record%3A%20We%20have%20lost%20almost%20every%20single%20time.%E2%80%9D&f=false) a terrible truth about war with China: Our spy and communications satellites would immediately be disabled; our forward bases in Guam and Japan would be “inundated” by precise missiles; our aircraft carriers would have to sail away from China to escape attack; our F-35 fighter jets couldn't reach their targets because the refueling tankers they need would be shot down.

“Many U.S. forces would be rendered deaf, dumb and blind,” writes Brose. We have become so vulnerable, he argues because we've lost sight of the essential requirement of military power — the “kill chain” of his title — which means seeing threats and taking quick, decisive action to stop them.

How did this happen? It wasn't an intelligence failure, or a malign Pentagon and Congress, or lack of money, or insufficient technological prowess. No, it was simply bureaucratic inertia compounded by entrenched interests. The Pentagon is good at doing what it did yesterday, and Congress insists on precisely that. We have been so busy buffing our legacy systems that, as Brose writes (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22ambushed%20by%20the%20future%22&f=false), “the United States got ambushed by the future.”

We should reflect on America's vulnerability now, when the world is on lockdown and we have a chance to reassess. A new world will emerge after the global coronavirus (https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/02/28/what-you-need-know-about-coronavirus) pandemic, one in which China is clearly determined to challenge the United States as a global power. The propaganda wars over the origin of the novel virus that causes covid-19 are just a warm-up for the tests that are ahead.

China's military isn't focused on projecting power, as ours is, but instead on preventing U.S. domination. Rather than match our fleets of carriers and squadrons of jets around the world, Beijing developed precision weapons to prevent the United States from mobilizing these forces. An example is the DF-21, the world's first ballistic anti-ship missile, which Brose says is known as “the carrier killer” (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT9&ots=xblLGZDMmk&dq=%E2%80%9COver%20the%20past%20decade%2C%20in%20U.S.%20war%20games%20against%20China%2C%20the%20United%20States%20has%20a%20nearly%20perfect%20record%3A%20We%20have%20lost%20almost%20every%20single%20time.%E2%80%9D&pg=PT11#v=onepage&q=%22carrier%20killer%22&f=false).

The Pentagon wants to confront the Chinese challenge, but it insists on keeping the same vulnerable, wildly expensive platforms at the center of the United States' military power. And Congress demands adherence to this status quo. When then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and then-Navy Secretary Richard Spencer tried to retire an aircraft carrier (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=2019%20retire%20carrier&f=false) in 2019, Congress refused. Expensive fighter jets have a lobby, too. As Brose notes (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22built%20in%20every%20state%22&f=false): “There is a reason why parts of the F-35 are built in every state in America…. It is political expediency.”

When the Pentagon tries to innovate, it's too hidebound to maneuver and adapt. A classic example is the Army's $18 billion misadventure (https://www.defensenews.com/30th-annivesary/2016/10/25/30-years-future-combat-systems-acquisition-gone-wrong/) known as “Future Combat Systems,” which was supposed to coordinate modern weapons but turned out to be less agile than a Sony PlayStation.

Brose argues that it's time for a radical rethink. Rather than building weapons for an outmoded strategy of projecting power, we should instead be arming ourselves in an effort to “deny China military dominance.” That means many cheap, autonomous weapons at the edge of the perimeter, rather than a few exquisite ones that are vulnerable to attack.

These smart systems exist: The Air Force's unmanned XQ-58A (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratos_XQ-58_Valkyrie), known as the “Valkyrie”, is nearly as capable as a fighter but costs about 45 times less (https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a31122720/kratos-xq58a-valkyrie-future/) than an F-35 (https://www.f35.com/about/cost); the Navy's Extra-Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle, known as the Orca (https://news.usni.org/2019/02/13/41119), is 300 times less costly than a $3.2 billion (https://news.usni.org/2019/10/10/cbo-navys-next-nuclear-attack-submarine-could-cost-5-5b-a-hull) Virginia-class attack submarine. But these robots don't have a lobby to rival the giant defense contractors.

Brose envisions a military version of the “Internet of things” — smart systems at the outer edges of our defenses which can blunt China's dominance without breaking the budget or risking all-or-nothing confrontations. “We have the money, the technological base, and the human talent,” he writes (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22we%20have%20the%20money%22&f=false). What we lack is the will to change.

The question for Americans to ponder, in Brose's simple formulation, is “how the future can win” (https://books.google.com/books?id=CW-nDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22how%20the%20future%20can%20win%22&f=false). We have a window of time now, thanks to our enforced lockdown, to do some creative thinking about defense. It would be foolish to enter a new, post-pandemic world with the same old hardware.


__________________________________________________________________________

David Ignatius (https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-ignatius) writes a twice-a-week foreign affairs column for The Washington Post and contributes to the PostPartisan (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan) blog. Ignatius has also written eight spy novels: Bloodmoney (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393341798) (2011), The Increment (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393338312) (2009), Body of Lies (https://www.amazon.com/dp/039333158X) (2007), The Sun King (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0812992431) (1999), A Firing Offense (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393346285) (1997), The Bank of Fear (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393346293) (1994), SIRO: A Novel (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393346307) (1991), and Agents of Innocence (https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393317382) (1987). Body of Lies was made into a 2008 film (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758774) starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe. Ignatius joined The Washington Post in 1986 as editor of its Sunday Outlook section. In 1990 he became foreign editor, and in 1993, assistant managing editor for business news. He began writing his column in 1998 and continued even during a three-year stint as executive editor of the International Herald Tribune in Paris. Earlier in his career, Ignatius was a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, covering at various times the steel industry, the Justice Department, the CIA, the Senate, the Middle East and the State Department. His numerous honours and awards include the 2000 Gerald Loeb Award for Commentary; the 2004 Edward Weintal Prize; the 2010 Urbino International Press Award; the 2013 Overseas Press Club Award for Foreign Affairs Commentary; a Lifetime Achievement Award from the International Committee for Foreign Journalists; a Legion D'Honneur awarded by the French government; and as The Washington Post's foreign editor, Ignatius supervised the paper's Pulitzer Prize-winning coverage of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwai. David Ignatius grew up in Washington, D.C., and studied political theory at Harvard College and economics at Kings College, Cambridge. His numerous He lives in Washington with his wife and has three daughters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/think-we-have-military-primacy-over-china-think-again/2020/05/12/268e1bba-948b-11ea-9f5e-56d8239bf9ad_story.html (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/think-we-have-military-primacy-over-china-think-again/2020/05/12/268e1bba-948b-11ea-9f5e-56d8239bf9ad_story.html)


Title: Re: War between America and China…
Post by: Kiwithrottlejockey on May 17, 2020, 09:58:16 pm

Ooooooh, look … here's America's stupid “fake president” aka “emperor with no clothes” … funny, eh?




(https://misc.pagesuite.com/3630c326-c935-42f5-b0da-daebc36b7646/images/768b4444-20e6-4d9a-8c4b-a7fb3275765a.jpg) (https://misc.pagesuite.com/3630c326-c935-42f5-b0da-daebc36b7646/images/768b4444-20e6-4d9a-8c4b-a7fb3275765a.jpg)


Title: Re: War between America and China…
Post by: Im2Sexy4MyPants on July 28, 2020, 02:15:30 pm
Fake News Washington Post Was paid by China to post propaganda Lies For Cash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEsGjONFF68